Actually, I'm surprised I even noticed it. 8-o J
--- Tom C <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Did I happen to mention that I hate the fact that even though I know > better, > and would guess I'm fairly intelligent, that my misapplication of > homophones > (words that sound the same but are spelled differently and usually > mean > different things) is getting worse and worse. > > Tom C. > > > > > Well THAT'S STUPID! One would think the software would be smart > enough to > see that the header line had changed and start a new thread. Do you > mean > I've been screwing up the archives all these years and know one here > has > SCREAMED THEIR HEAD OFF at me? > > Tom C. > > > > > >From: "P. J. Alling" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >Reply-To: [email protected] > >To: [email protected] > >Subject: Re: List Question > >Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2006 19:16:47 -0400 > > > >Properly formated threads don't depend on the subject line. > Properly > >formed threads use the "in reply to" field, in the message header > IIRC. > > > >Tom C wrote: > > > >>I, as many others are having problems receiving all the messages > fron the > >>list, often not my own. I'm not blaming this on any of the PDML > list > >>inner workings. Is is in general aggravating. > >> > >>I am curious though... Sometimes I'll reply to an existing PDML > e-mail in > >>order to have the > >>[email protected] appear automatically in the To: field. I > then > >>erase the body of the message and substitute my own subject line. > >>However, when I look in the archives, I see my sent message > embedded in > >>the earlier thread ***even though the subject line has changed***. > >> > >> > >>Tom C. > >> > >> > >> > >> > > > > > >-- > >When you're worried or in doubt, Run in circles, (scream and > shout). > > > > > __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com
