> > From: "Tom C" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: 2006/04/26 Wed PM 11:08:04 GMT > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: List Question > > Well THAT'S STUPID! One would think the software would be smart enough to > see that the header line had changed and start a new thread. Do you mean > I've been screwing up the archives all these years and know one here has > SCREAMED THEIR HEAD OFF at me? > > Tom C.
You're not the only one....... > > > > > >From: "P. J. Alling" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >Reply-To: [email protected] > >To: [email protected] > >Subject: Re: List Question > >Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2006 19:16:47 -0400 > > > >Properly formated threads don't depend on the subject line. Properly > >formed threads use the "in reply to" field, in the message header IIRC. > > > >Tom C wrote: > > > >>I, as many others are having problems receiving all the messages fron the > >>list, often not my own. I'm not blaming this on any of the PDML list > >>inner workings. Is is in general aggravating. > >> > >>I am curious though... Sometimes I'll reply to an existing PDML e-mail in > >>order to have the > >>[email protected] appear automatically in the To: field. I then > >>erase the body of the message and substitute my own subject line. > >>However, when I look in the archives, I see my sent message embedded in > >>the earlier thread ***even though the subject line has changed***. > >> > >> > >>Tom C. > >> > >> > >> > >> > > > > > >-- > >When you're worried or in doubt, Run in circles, (scream and shout). > > > > > ----------------------------------------- Email sent from www.ntlworld.com Virus-checked using McAfee(R) Software Visit www.ntlworld.com/security for more information
