On 7 Apr 2006 at 16:46, Shel Belinkoff wrote: > I'm of a different opinion. The question was about what a photographer > might want, which may be different in many ways from what the program(s) > may offer. A photographer may have a perfect understanding of raw > conversion, but s/he may ~want~ something more or different. One thing has > little or nothing to do with the other.
I haven't read the Bruce Fraser book but since its mention I've read many of his on-line articles and overall he seems to be describing the use of the RAW convertor as a photographic tool so I can't see why it wouldn't be appropriate? In any case the thread appears to be turning out a bit like another recent and forgettable flaming session. Rob Studdert HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA Tel +61-2-9554-4110 UTC(GMT) +10 Hours [EMAIL PROTECTED] http:/home.swiftdsl.com.au/~distudio/publications/ Pentax user since 1986, PDMLer since 1998
