You're welcome. But it's just such an old whine.
On Feb 9, 2006, at 8:27 AM, Rob Studdert wrote:
On 9 Feb 2006 at 6:33, Paul Stenquist wrote:
Huh? We just read that there will be a higher spec camera come
Photokina. We don't even know what the specs are yet, but you've
already decided that it's not good enough. That's so typical of the
mindless negativism that pervades the list.
It's all about timing and delivery, what ever comes when it comes
better be
spec'd better then the current bodies or it won't just be me
generating what
you mistakenly deem as "mindless negativism". Heard of the boy who
cried wolf?
We're tired of reading how you're going to do that. Shit or get off
the
pot.
Given that often local Pentax distributors have problems determining
if current
lenses are in or out of production or are or are not available (or
even if they
exist in some cases) I find it hard to view the article with other
than a
little scepticism. Given the suggested time line in that article what
is your
personal assessment of a potential date of actual availability for a
body that
would qualify as a replacement for the *ist D?
BTW I was surprised at your retort I might occasionally be a stubborn
curmudgeon but try not to be an outwardly rude bastard and as such I
don't
expect to be replied to in such a fashion. PS And thanks for the tip
but I can
work out when to get off the pot myself.
Cheers,
Rob Studdert
HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA
Tel +61-2-9554-4110
UTC(GMT) +10 Hours
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://members.ozemail.com.au/~distudio/publications/
Pentax user since 1986, PDMLer since 1998
