That won't work. I'll bet half the group have more than one Sigma, Tokina, Zenitar, Vivitar and others in K mount or even M42. Not only that, but this rule would exclude images taken though microscopes and telescopes. Some part of the equipment needs to be Pentax and the body is the obvious choice.

Don

John Forbes wrote:
Perhaps we should make it more restrictive. It's the lens that counts, not the body. Why not stipulate that the picture must have been taken using a Pentax lens?

John


On Mon, 30 Jan 2006 09:11:54 -0000, Jaume Lahuerta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

Oh yes, sure, but the difference with the PUG is that,
here, I 'know' many of the submiters (or at least I
have read their posts for many years), and I know that
I will receive their feedback if I comment or ask for
details in the PDML.

 --- Rob Studdert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escribió:

I don't know about the last point, it may have been
valid in the past but if
you are interested in seeing what Pentax cameras can
produce there are almost
14000 shots made using Pentax kit here:

http://www.flickr.com/photos/tags/pentax/


Rob Studdert
HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA
Tel +61-2-9554-4110
UTC(GMT)  +10 Hours
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

http://members.ozemail.com.au/~distudio/publications/
Pentax user since 1986, PDMLer since 1998





______________________________________________
LLama Gratis a cualquier PC del Mundo.
Llamadas a fijos y móviles desde 1 céntimo por minuto.
http://es.voice.yahoo.com





--
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.375 / Virus Database: 267.14.23/243 - Release Date: 27/01/2006





--Using Opera's revolutionary e-mail client: http://www.opera.com/m2/



--No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.375 / Virus Database: 267.14.23/243 - Release Date: 27/01/2006



--
Dr E D F Williams
__________________________________
http://www.kolumbus.fi/mimosa/index.htm
http://personal.inet.fi/cool/don.williams
See feature: The Cement Company from Hell
Updated: Added Print Gallery - 16 11 2005

Reply via email to