Personally I don't care about equipment - it's all about the photos.
Well I do & there are plenty of other sites to view images.
We don't need no stinkin larger photos.
Kenneth Waller
----- Original Message -----
From: "David Mann" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: PUG (No longer Re: *istD2)
On Jan 30, 2006, at 11:56 PM, Dario Bonazza wrote:
I keep suggesting the most obvious rule:
"There must be some Pentax equipment involved"
(IMO, even disguised, if well known it is Pentax like in case of
Samsung clones)
Personally I don't care about equipment - it's all about the photos.
On the other hand I see the whole point of the PUG being advocacy of
Pentax gear. We have plenty of places available to show photos taken
with other gear via paws, pesos or just random links every now and
then. So I'd agree with the rule above, which is basically
maintaining the status quo.
Now that I'm scanning a lot more, I might be able to submit more
photos if reminders are posted to the list. I do feel a little
guilty throwing my opinion into the pile when I haven't submitted a
pic since 2003 :(
I'm happy with the current rules regarding dimensions, mainly because
it's identical to what I use in my own website. Allowing slightly
larger files would be nice though.
Cheers,
- Dave
http://www.bluemoon.net.nz/
http://www.digistar.com/~dmann/
