----- Original Message ----- From: "Paul Stenquist"
Subject: Re: Bloomburg on Pentax financial woes


It's not a shell game, it's just smart marketing. Getting the most return on your development money is a good thing. There was a fellow in Detroit who was an expert at that kind of marketing. His name was lee Iacocca. He worked for Ford in the days when they were really number two. He had this car called Falcon that had been only mildly successful and whose development costs had never been recovered. He decided to give it some different sheetmetal and reintroduce it with another name. I believe it was called "Mustang." It generated enough profit that the company was able to develop some rather nice follow-ups to that original. Later he played the same game for even bigger stakes for Chrysler with a car called the "K." The same basic 1980 platform was used to build at least twenty cars, all the way up to the 2003 Chrysler Town and Country and Dodge Caravan minivans. It saved the company from almost certain bankruptcy and set the stage for what is now the only profitable US car company. Rebadging a product to stimulate sales is almost always a good idea. Frankly, I'm surprised that Pentax plays it as smart as they obviously do.

Not a bad analogy, but there are some holes in it that I could drive my Titan through. The Falcon didn't have much styling appeal, the Mustang did much better in this regard.
I recall the Mustang was given a really hard sell in the media as well.

Who remembers the "Must get a Mustang" ads?
The K car and Caravan appealed to different market segments, or at one least market segment that had outgrown the other.

The istDs, Dl, DL2 and whatever else they have called the thing appeals to the same demographic, and has more or less the same style appeal. Pentax needs to appeal to something other than the lowest market segment. This means making their better lenses available as something other than ephemera on their websites, and making cameras that at least compete with their competitors lowest end cameras.

William Robb

Reply via email to