Well, Ok Tom, lets leave it there. Jack
--- Tom C <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Jack, > > You've got me riled and I can't shut up. > > Eveidently then you're not aware of the "witch hunts" that occur on a > > regular basis in this country where a psychopathic social worker goes > off on > a crusade riding a white horse, sees crimes where there was none, > abuses > their power and effectively ruins tens, maybe hundreds of peoples > lives. To > be caught a year or more down the road and when the evidence comes > out it > turns out that much if not most of it was fabricated, and believed, > and > corroborrated by school teachers, psycologists, policeman, who not > knowing > how to investigate such cases simply *went along* with what the > *expert* > told them. > > What you are describing Jack is not justice. > > Tom C. > > > > > >From: Jack Davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >Reply-To: [email protected] > >To: [email protected] > >Subject: Re: Vigilant or Bloody Minded > >Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2006 09:11:29 -0800 (PST) > > > >Sorry for the circumstances in which a prudent action resulted in > >"unfair" treatment of anyone, but obscure possibilities shouldn't > >negate responsible action. > >Look the other way, don't get involved, pontificate a magnanimous > >selfless tolerance toward all, at a cocktail party, is a clouded > >performance of an unrealistic view of reality. > > > >Jack > > > >--- Tom C <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > Jack, you never answered an earlier question. > > > > > > What if I did same to you based on something I heard, knew, or > > > thought I > > > knew? > > > > > > Sorry, just looking out for everyones' interests...Oh you lost > your > > > job?... > > > Oh, now your new prospective employer wants a reference from your > > > prior > > > one?... Oh, now you have no friends?... Oh now you have no place > to > > > live? > > > Oh, now when you go to court you have no income and have to rely > on a > > > > > > court-appointed public-defender? Oh, now since you got a > bottom-of > > > -the-barrel lawyer jury selection was skewed against you? Oh, now > > > you're in > > > prision because of a colossal misunderstanding? > > > > > > Sorry Jack... I was just doing what I thought was best. Never > mind > > > I don't > > > actually know all the details. Sorry your life is screwed up. > > > > > > Tom C. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >From: Jack Davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > >Reply-To: [email protected] > > > >To: [email protected] > > > >Subject: Re: Vigilant or Bloody Minded > > > >Date: Mon, 9 Jan 2006 18:47:57 -0800 (PST) > > > > > > > >I know and that's why it should be discussed between the owner > and > > > >employee, with extreme clarity, to permit the situation the air > it > > > >needs for the relationship to stay healthy. > > > >If the owner is troubled by the result, his options are clear > and he > > > >will be acting only for himself. > > > > > > > >Jack > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > > > > > > > In a message dated 1/9/2006 6:16:52 PM Pacific Standard Time, > > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > > > > > If I may Marnie, your reaction is exactly that I initially > > > offered. > > > > > What a diatribe it launched. > > > > > Why is it so difficult for many to grasp? > > > > > Kevin, would like to learn your decision when reached. > > > > > > > > > > Jack > > > > > ======= > > > > > Well, for one thing, I wasn't agreeing with the majority, > though > > > I > > > > > haven't > > > > > finished the thread yet. :-) > > > > > > > > > > But for me, it changed, when Kevin said he was personally > > > involved > > > > > even at a > > > > > distance. That's a different kettle of fish. And I am not > aware > > > that > > > > > he is > > > > > under any "gag order" not to mention it. As a parent and a > victim > > > and > > > > > a customer, > > > > > Kevin is entitled to his reactions. And has the freedom of > speech > > > to > > > > > voice > > > > > them. And the vendor has the right to know they may have > hired > > > > > someone, > > > > > unknowingly, that might turn customers off. Although the > store > > > owner > > > > > may know already > > > > > and he/she also has the right to hire whom he/she wants. > > > Customers > > > > > also have > > > > > the right not to patronize his/her store. > > > > > > > > > > I think it's because, Jack, people do get accused that later > turn > > > out > > > > > to be > > > > > innocent. And that is something to be concerned about. But I > > > don't > > > > > think, > > > > > personally, it negates the above. > > > > > > > > > > Marnie aka Doe > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >__________________________________________ > > > >Yahoo! DSL Something to write home about. > > > >Just $16.99/mo. or less. > > > >dsl.yahoo.com > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >__________________________________________ > >Yahoo! DSL Something to write home about. > >Just $16.99/mo. or less. > >dsl.yahoo.com > > > > > __________________________________________ Yahoo! DSL Something to write home about. Just $16.99/mo. or less. dsl.yahoo.com
