In that case why not put spy cameras in everyone's homes so the government
can watch? Prevent the uncommitted crime from occurring.
Encourage public schools to pry into personal matters. Encourage school
children to tell when their parents' personal views differ from those
popularly accepted. Encourage neighbor to spy upon neighbor.
I don't know about you, but that's not where I want to live.
Tom C.
From: Jack Davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [email protected]
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Vigilant or Bloody Minded
Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2006 09:11:29 -0800 (PST)
Sorry for the circumstances in which a prudent action resulted in
"unfair" treatment of anyone, but obscure possibilities shouldn't
negate responsible action.
Look the other way, don't get involved, pontificate a magnanimous
selfless tolerance toward all, at a cocktail party, is a clouded
performance of an unrealistic view of reality.
Jack
--- Tom C <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Jack, you never answered an earlier question.
>
> What if I did same to you based on something I heard, knew, or
> thought I
> knew?
>
> Sorry, just looking out for everyones' interests...Oh you lost your
> job?...
> Oh, now your new prospective employer wants a reference from your
> prior
> one?... Oh, now you have no friends?... Oh now you have no place to
> live?
> Oh, now when you go to court you have no income and have to rely on a
>
> court-appointed public-defender? Oh, now since you got a bottom-of
> -the-barrel lawyer jury selection was skewed against you? Oh, now
> you're in
> prision because of a colossal misunderstanding?
>
> Sorry Jack... I was just doing what I thought was best. Never mind
> I don't
> actually know all the details. Sorry your life is screwed up.
>
> Tom C.
>
>
>
>
> >From: Jack Davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >Reply-To: [email protected]
> >To: [email protected]
> >Subject: Re: Vigilant or Bloody Minded
> >Date: Mon, 9 Jan 2006 18:47:57 -0800 (PST)
> >
> >I know and that's why it should be discussed between the owner and
> >employee, with extreme clarity, to permit the situation the air it
> >needs for the relationship to stay healthy.
> >If the owner is troubled by the result, his options are clear and he
> >will be acting only for himself.
> >
> >Jack
> >
> >
> >
> >--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >
> > > In a message dated 1/9/2006 6:16:52 PM Pacific Standard Time,
> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> > > If I may Marnie, your reaction is exactly that I initially
> offered.
> > > What a diatribe it launched.
> > > Why is it so difficult for many to grasp?
> > > Kevin, would like to learn your decision when reached.
> > >
> > > Jack
> > > =======
> > > Well, for one thing, I wasn't agreeing with the majority, though
> I
> > > haven't
> > > finished the thread yet. :-)
> > >
> > > But for me, it changed, when Kevin said he was personally
> involved
> > > even at a
> > > distance. That's a different kettle of fish. And I am not aware
> that
> > > he is
> > > under any "gag order" not to mention it. As a parent and a victim
> and
> > > a customer,
> > > Kevin is entitled to his reactions. And has the freedom of speech
> to
> > > voice
> > > them. And the vendor has the right to know they may have hired
> > > someone,
> > > unknowingly, that might turn customers off. Although the store
> owner
> > > may know already
> > > and he/she also has the right to hire whom he/she wants.
> Customers
> > > also have
> > > the right not to patronize his/her store.
> > >
> > > I think it's because, Jack, people do get accused that later turn
> out
> > > to be
> > > innocent. And that is something to be concerned about. But I
> don't
> > > think,
> > > personally, it negates the above.
> > >
> > > Marnie aka Doe
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >__________________________________________
> >Yahoo! DSL Something to write home about.
> >Just $16.99/mo. or less.
> >dsl.yahoo.com
> >
>
>
>
__________________________________________
Yahoo! DSL Something to write home about.
Just $16.99/mo. or less.
dsl.yahoo.com
