From: "Shel Belinkoff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

The question in my mind is what did he specifically admit to?  None of us
know to what he exactly admitted.  For example, he may have taken innocent
pics and his uncle may have sent them to porn sites. He may have some
peripheral involvement, but not enough to be guilty of any crimes. IOW, we
on this list do not know enough to make a reasonable judgement.  We only
know what Kevin has said, and he admits to having a bias as his children
were allegedly photographed.  Kevin has not provided enough specific
information about what this man has allegedly done.  Some of the statements
Kevin has made is leading me to think that he is biased, prejudicial,
mean-spirited, and irrational.

If we on this list are going to proffer opinions, then we need all the
facts presented clearly and in an unbiased manner.  IMO, we don't have all
the facts, and those which we have are nothing more than hearsay presented
by someone who admits to having a personal involvement in the case - IOW,
not a disinterested party.

That so many people on this list would want to take action against this guy
frightens me. And lets be concerned about everyone's rights in this
situation.  Trial by an ill-informed internet mailing list does not seem to
be in anybody's best interest.


Shel

It's far too easy in cases like this for things to be blown far out of proportion. It's human nature for a story to be exaggerated. What's more, very often the police, social workers, and prosecuting attorneys deliberately lie, mislead, distort, and exaggerate in an attempt, to make the charges stick and build such a wall of "evidence" that the accused either has little chance of winning or that they give up the fight. Their job is not to make people appear innocent now, is it?

I agree with you Shel... I'm afraid too. For those that say some intevention should be taken... it's simply prejudging the man without knowing ANY of the FACTS. We've heard one person's very short story on the matter.

If the individual is guilty of any heinous crimes, it's for those who understand the facts and hear the evidence to decide what they believe.

Tom C.


Reply via email to