I agree with your first sentence. The number of perfect boring pictures has increased .-)
DagT > fra: "J. C. O'Connell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > I don't know about the exact numbers but I agree that > the technology definitely reduces lost shots. That's > why I don't agree with PENTAX removing the AE technology > from K/M lenses without any compatability issues > causing it. > > JCO > > -----Original Message----- > From: Herb Chong [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, September 23, 2005 6:35 AM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: Re: How Pentax Could Survive > > > being an excellent wildlife photographer isn't enough. photo editors are > continuing raise the standard for what is acceptable and that 1 out of 1000 > shot of 30 years ago has become a 1 out of 10 shot of today, most because of > > technology. > > Herb.... > ----- Original Message ----- > From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[email protected]> > Sent: Friday, September 23, 2005 3:47 AM > Subject: Re: Re: How Pentax Could Survive > > > > So being a photographer is easy, you just have to buy more expencive > > equipment? I'd better buy a 1Ds MkII then... .-) > > >
