I like the M200/4. I've used it extensively with the *istD, and it produces nice results. Great bang for the buck. Here's two shots that are posted on PhotoNet. (Wakeboarding pics that have been seen here before.) http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=2686457 http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=2686452 Paul
> > ----- Original Message ----- > From: > Subject: D series & 200/4 models > > > > Has anyone as yet compared the A, M, & K > > 200/4 lenses on a digital body? > > Are results available to view? > > The M200/4 is definitely optically not as good as the FA200/4 Macro. > Not that the M is bad, the FA is just particularly good. > No examples, just my usual unscientific way of looking at pictures. > Oh yes, the FA also offers autofocus, macro focus and full metering > compatability with the istD. > > William Robb > >
