The FA 200 macro is in a class by itself. Much fairer to compare it to
any of the other 200's that's all. (This was not meant as a criticism,
just a comment).
William Robb wrote:
----- Original Message ----- From: "P. J. Alling" Subject: Re: D
series & 200/4 models
Well that's kind of unfair, the FA is a macro, I would expect it to
be _much_ sharper than the M, focus much more closely and cost a
whale lot more...
I did say that the M wasn't a bad lens, just that the FA is exemplary.
Money wasn't mentioned as part of the criteria in the original post.
William Robb
--
When you're worried or in doubt,
Run in circles, (scream and shout).
