That may be true strictly for photo editing. But from all I hear the raw converter in CS2 is greatly superior to that in CS
(I didn't see any good prices on CS, apart from one dubious deal that offered only the CD and a serial number) On Fri, Sep 09, 2005 at 08:05:50AM -0700, Shel Belinkoff wrote: > I wouldn't consider CS2 at this point. As a frequent visitor and > participant in Adobe's User-toUser forums I've gotten to see and learn > about the myriad of problems many people are having with the program. I > don't want to underwrite the cost of experimenting with CS2 right now with > my time or dollars. However, a free trial download, or from a disk, would > be worthwhile to see how CS2 works on your machine. > > Strictly for photo editing, CS2 doesn't offer much over CS, IMO. Go for CS > and upgrade later if you feel you need more "features." > > Shel > "Am I paranoid or perceptive?" > > > > [Original Message] > > From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > Hey, looking at Amazon, I was just noticing that CS (1) is now very > > affordable! > > > > Unless there is some overwhelming compelling reason to get CS2 instead of > 1, > > CS now sounds good. >
