Lots of problems with activation, crashing, slowness, seeming
incompatibility with a number of video drivers, tools not working ...of
course, the User-to-User forums are where people who have problems go, but
a few of the long time regulars there say that they hadn't seen as many
problems with CS or v 7.0.  A few people on the PS mail list have
experienced problems as well.

I suspect that most people are OK.  I just don't want to spend a lot of
time DL'ing the program with a slow dial-up connection only to have to be
one of the people with the problems.  I'll wait until the istDS is here and
try to find a free sample on a disk (some of the magazines from the UK have
such disks) and give it a test spin then.  There are enough new features to
certainly make me curious ;-))  What I was saying is that I'd not go out
and buy the program without testing it with a free 30 day trial first, even
if I can get it for the upgrade price, which is quite inexpensive,
relatively speaking.

Shel 
"Am I paranoid or perceptive?" 


> [Original Message]
> From: David Savage 

> What sort of problems Shel?
>
> I bought the upgrade from CS some months ago and I haven't had any
> problems on my somewhat aging machine (Pentium 2.5GHz, 1G RAM, Winduz
> XP Pro). The improved batch processing of raw files, the ability to do
> raw processing without having to start Photoshop & the smart sharpen
> feature (which I prefer over USM now) are very handy. Is it worth the
> extra expense? I don't know. I do agree though that most of the
> improvements are aimed at graphic designers.
>
> Dave
>
>
>
> On 9/9/05, Shel Belinkoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I wouldn't consider CS2 at this point.  As a frequent visitor and
> > participant in Adobe's User-toUser forums I've gotten to see and learn
> > about the myriad of problems many people are having with the program.  I
> > don't want to underwrite the cost of experimenting with CS2 right now
with
> > my time or dollars.  However, a free trial download, or from a disk,
would
> > be worthwhile to see how CS2 works on your machine.
> > 
> > Strictly for photo editing, CS2 doesn't offer much over CS, IMO.  Go
for CS
> > and upgrade later if you feel you need more "features."
> > 
> > Shel
> > "Am I paranoid or perceptive?"
> > 
> > 
> > > [Original Message]
> > > Wrom: YLEJGDGVCJVTLBXFGGM
> > 
> > 
> > > Hey, looking at Amazon, I was just noticing that CS (1) is now very
> > > affordable!
> > >
> > > Unless there is some overwhelming compelling reason to get CS2
instead of
> > 1,
> > > CS now sounds good.
> > 
> > 
> >


Reply via email to