Boris,

It costs a bit, but you should really look closely at
the 24-90.  The extra 4mm at the wide end open lots of
interesting compositional opportunities, it's sharp,
handles well, and has nice bokeh.

Rick

--- Boris Liberman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Hi!
> 
> I realize that this has been discussed to dust (if
> there is such a 
> term)... So let's make it brief, shall we. :-)
> 
> How good/bad performs SMC FA 28-105/4-5.6 (not power
> zoom, but Tamron 
> rebadged lens) compared to 28-70/4 AL. I do realize
> that it is going to 
> be 35 mm longer. I am however interested in the rest
> of the differences.
> 
> Thanks.
> 
> Boris
> 
> 


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 

Reply via email to