MX vs K1000
I was able to swap straight across a plastic bodied K1000 in new condition
with a f2.0 lens for a equally fine MX with a A 50f1.4. You figure it out as
we were both over the moon!
Bob
----- Original Message -----
From: "Peter Alling" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, June 27, 2001 1:11 PM
Subject: Re: MX Question.
> Which is a mystery.
>
> At 12:23 PM 6/25/2001 -0500, you wrote:
> >The MX is/has ...
> >#1 Smaller & lighter
> >#2 see the aperture through the finder via a nide little window to the
> >outside.
> >#3 Interchangable viewing screens
> >#4 DOF Preview
> >#5 Self-timer
> >#6 Shutter release lock/power switch
> >#7 LEDs for meter display vs. centering needle
> >#8 Takes 2 batteries vs. 1 in the K-1000.
> >
> >It's interesting to note that used K-1000 bodies sell
> >for about the same price as a nice MX body.
> >
> >Collin
> >
> >At 08:53 AM 6/25/01 -0600, you wrote:
> >>New to the pentax world so forgive me if this is an obvious answer but
> >>What are the main differences between the MX and my K-1000. From a
> >>user-interface perspective, they look almost identical -except for what
I
> >>assume to be a self timer on the front...
> >>
> >>
> >>Mike Y.
> >
> >
> >* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
> > <>< <>< <>< <>< <>< <>< <>< <>< <>< <>< <>< <><
> >
> >-
> >This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
> >go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
> >visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
>
> -
> This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
> go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
> visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
>
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
