Which is a mystery.
At 12:23 PM 6/25/2001 -0500, you wrote:
>The MX is/has ...
>#1 Smaller & lighter
>#2 see the aperture through the finder via a nide little window to the
>outside.
>#3 Interchangable viewing screens
>#4 DOF Preview
>#5 Self-timer
>#6 Shutter release lock/power switch
>#7 LEDs for meter display vs. centering needle
>#8 Takes 2 batteries vs. 1 in the K-1000.
>
>It's interesting to note that used K-1000 bodies sell
>for about the same price as a nice MX body.
>
>Collin
>
>At 08:53 AM 6/25/01 -0600, you wrote:
>>New to the pentax world so forgive me if this is an obvious answer but
>>What are the main differences between the MX and my K-1000. From a
>>user-interface perspective, they look almost identical -except for what I
>>assume to be a self timer on the front...
>>
>>
>>Mike Y.
>
>
>* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
> <>< <>< <>< <>< <>< <>< <>< <>< <>< <>< <>< <><
>
>-
>This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
>go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
>visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
