Cotty wrote:
On 31/5/05, William Robb, discombobulated, unleashed:
I guess that was my point.
People don't realize sometimes just how big the big Canon is.
It's something to consider when you are wishing for performance enhancement
features though.
I think it appears big when all one is used to is smaller gear. I enjoy
the MX, which is very small. But holding a Canon, I don't consider it
unduly big. I must be odd....
Perhaps you are odd, Cotty; I haven't met you so I can't say -- but in
*this* case, perhaps it's because you are BIG?
