Bill, that is shocking! I used to use 67II's and did NOT think they were light or small. At least it had a big negative. That Canon is one BIG camera for having a sensor of that size.
-- Bruce Tuesday, May 31, 2005, 9:21:24 PM, you wrote: WR> ----- Original Message ----- WR> From: "Boris Liberman" WR> Subject: Re: OT: Kodak kills DSLR >> Folks, what bugs me much more is not the signs of digital age as Shel >> pointed out. Consider, now we're back to only one company providing >> (albeit mighty excellent) full frame DSLR... It means - lack of real >> competition and lack of choice... We're back to 2002 (is it the year when >> 1Ds was introduced), aren't we? WR> Here is a strange comparison for you. WR> The Canon EOS-1Ds Mark II is: WR> 156 x 158 x 80 mm, and 1565 grams, battery in. WR> The Pentax 67II is WR> 185.5mm x 151.0mm x 106.0mm and 1660g with AE Pentaprism Finder, but no WR> batteries. WR> Anyone know what a couple of CR-123 batteries weighs? WR> Just being silly..... WR> William Robb
