On 5/25/05, Cotty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I think what Tom is aiming at is having a path to more upmarket models. > Like, if you buy into a carmaker that has economy and midrange cars, but > no high end sport model, you might consider switching brands for that > sport model. The fact that your brand has no high end sport model means > that you have no choice. With a brand that has economy, midrange, SUV, > top notch sport models, and even full-on luxury cars, at least you have a > choice. > > I think car analogies are dangerous in any event. If I wanted a top > performing sports car, I would look at Aston Martin. If I wanted an SUV, > Land Rover. Horses for courses :-)
I think the problem with the car analogy, is that each automobile that you own is a complete unit in and of itself. Nothing need be interchangeable from car to car in order to get the most out of each of them. Obviously, not so with cameras, where most of us desire a system with interchangeability of lenses, bodies, flashes, etc. cheers, frank -- "Sharpness is a bourgeois concept." -Henri Cartier-Bresson
