I think you mixed my replies with somebody else. :) ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jens Bladt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[email protected]> Sent: Friday, May 20, 2005 3:47 PM Subject: RE: Understanding exposure? Recommendations?
> Perhaps you are rigth, Bob. > I really have been talking to myself. You have certainly not been listening: > > I wrote: > The first lesson in exposure could very well be this: > Photograph a black door - use the built-in meter default settings. > Photograph a white door - use the built-in meter default settings. > You'll end up with two IDENTICAL images: Two grey doors! > When you figure out why, then you know the first and most important > thing about exposure! > > Bob answered: > > > So what, you captured all the details, just use Photoshop and make the > > door white or black. > > And Bob, you have at least twice stated that knowlede/skills as to how to > expose > properly only is important to people who want to be good printers: > > >"Yes - those things are important for people who want to go on to become > good > >printers. But you have to be able to walk before you can run." > I have several times stated, that proper exposure has nothing to do with > pinting. Exposure is exposure. > > In my point of view, Mikey asks about exposure. A lot of us come with > sincere and hopefully helpful anwsers. > And Bob demestrates his contempt for the subject by stating that either it's > not important (unless you want to be a good printer) - or - that you can > just fix it in Photoshop. > > I can understand why you are not listening. > Who wants to be confronted with having said things like this? > > Jens Bladt > mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://hjem.get2net.dk/bladt > >
