I can understand that. Perhaps I should have bought your 24-90mm instead :-) Too late now - and it's probably more expensive as well. I have settled fpr the Tokina 2.6-2.8/28-70mm insted of the obvious choise - the FA* 2.8/28-70mm, which has a list price her at 3000 USD (OUTCH). I paid 250 + taxes for the Tokina. My next lens will probably still have a name that includes a "14" or "18" mm.
I believe some of Pentax consumer zooms (24-90mm) is sometimes very good for the money. The pro-lenses are often as or even more expensive than other top brands (Nikon, Canon). Jens Bladt mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://hjem.get2net.dk/bladt -----Oprindelig meddelelse----- Fra: Herb Chong [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sendt: 19. maj 2005 04:44 Til: [email protected] Emne: Re: Eanablement: F-24-50mm it depends on your standards. i consider my FA 24-90 merely adequate and basically don't use it anymore. it's also not as wide as i would like when used on the *istD. when i can afford the weight, i would rather have the FA* 28-70 instead. Herb... ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jens Bladt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[email protected]> Sent: Wednesday, May 18, 2005 11:17 AM Subject: RE: Eanablement: F-24-50mm > That's not bad is it? I believe the FA 24-90mm is widely regarded as a > fine > lens.
