Thanks all! Me, the D, 135/2.8, 200/4, 90/2.8 and 28-75/2.8 are on the way!
Don > -----Original Message----- > From: Paul Stenquist [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, May 17, 2005 6:31 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: ist-D at ISO 1600, worth it? > > > Shoot 1600. The digital noise will be no more obtrusive than color neg > grain at that speed, less by some estimations. It's certainly okay up > to 8x10. > Paul > On May 17, 2005, at 6:43 PM, Don Sanderson wrote: > > > A neighbor just asked me to photograph her school > > performance tonite. > > If I stick with my best primes and RAW do you think > > I can get acceptable quality at ISO 1600? > > Or should I keep the ISO down and take the 500FTZ? > > Typical stage lighting, 4x6 to 8x10 prints. > > > > Comments/Opinions appreciated. > > Don > > >
