It is, in my opinion, a much smarter approach. The real problem though, is if they do that, then they will have to concede the MF market totally (as they probably should), because they don't have enough resources to do both simultaneously. And if they wait any longer on the MF market, it will be dead. My hunch is they think they can squeak by a little longer in the 35mm world than in the MF world. I think they are wrong - MF will probably not survive.
-- Best regards, Bruce Friday, April 22, 2005, 6:00:53 PM, you wrote: RS> On 22 Apr 2005 at 19:32, Herb Chong wrote: >> which is why ti think hey should have been working on an upgrade body over >> the >> *istD instead of a 645D. RS> This is far too logical an approach Herb, you know that. RS> Rob Studdert RS> HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA RS> Tel +61-2-9554-4110 RS> UTC(GMT) +10 Hours RS> [EMAIL PROTECTED] RS> http://members.ozemail.com.au/~distudio/publications/ RS> Pentax user since 1986, PDMLer since 1998
