I'd have thought the result would have appeared sharper. IAC, I like what I see
Shel > [Original Message] > From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > I think Bil was being facetious. I don't see anything soft about the unadulterated images. Although it's impossible to determine sharpness conclusively from a small web-based image, the look of her eyes suggest that these are quite sharp. > > > > Wait a minit. I thought the 77 was supposed to be extremely sharp - some > > saying even too sharp for portraits. Perhaps what you're getting is in part > > the effect of the softness digital brings to an image, not so much the > > quality of the lens by itself?
