Yup, it doesn't get much sharper than that.
> > ----- Original Message ----- > From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[email protected]> > Sent: Thursday, April 07, 2005 8:51 AM > Subject: Re: peso: A Small Gallery, no softening this time. > > > >I think Bil was being facetious. I don't see anything soft about the > >unadulterated images. Although it's impossible to determine sharpness > >conclusively from a small web-based image, the look of her eyes suggest > >that these are quite sharp. > > > > I may have missed the focus slightly on a few of em. > Sometimes I forget to breath. > Here is a detail from one of the pictures. > Again, this is a straight RAW conversion with no USM added, and is at 100% > My default settings are on the low side as well, I had the sharpness setting > in the converter at 25. > http://users.accesscomm.ca/wrobb/pictures/flannery/eye_detail..html > I have no sharpness issues with the 77. > > I find I do like it more as a portrait lens on the digital than I ever did > on film. I think film is more sensitive to some of the lens's abilities than > the digital sensor. > > William Robb > >
