I don't have the original scan on my computer. I probably deleted it, since it was over 200 meg. If I have time, I'll scan it again.
Paul
On Apr 2, 2005, at 10:42 AM, Kostas Kavoussanakis wrote:


On Sat, 2 Apr 2005, Paul Stenquist wrote:

This example, which was seen in a previous inferior version, was shot
razor sharp with the 6x7 and 165/4, so every pore was in evidence.
Softened in PS. The eyes are even softened a wee bit. The rest of the
image is softened considerably. But I had the option of choosing my
level of detail, because I had full detail to work with:
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=1176185&size=lg

Thanks for sharing. I cannot offer a comment at the moment, as the laptop is not good for such things. Would you have the original by any chance?

Kostas




Reply via email to