Did I say that older lenses are "superior?"  I just said there's a market
for them.  Some older lenses may be superior to newer glass, but, Anonymous
One, it's necessary to define superior.  Different lenses have different
fingerprints, as it were, different optical qualities, and depending on the
look and feel one wishes to achieve, an older lens, with low contrast or
less sharpness, or different bokeh, may be superior to a newer lens for a
given task.  If you desire to use only newer glass, that's your choice. But
don't go putting words in my mouth.

And I do have a small collection of vintage cars, and while they are not
"superior" in many respects to newer cars, they are in some ways, and they
certainly provide a pleasure and gratification that newer cars don't.

Shel 


> [Original Message]
> From: Quasi Modo 

> Let the market decide, Shel.   If you want to collect lenses and that
> floats your boat, by all means do.   But the only delusions are indeed
> yours if you think a) they're consistently and noticably superior
> optically to their younger AF siblings and b) they're worthy
> investments.   By all means collate the relevant data as you see it,
> talk to someone who actually designs lenses for a living, preferably
> with the company concerned, learn the history and find yourself
> completely debunked as I did.
>
> Anyway we're here to learn not impose idiosyncratic mindsets but if it
> were larger items such as older cars the (de)merits of collection
> become immediately apparent.
>
>
> On Tue, 29 Mar 2005 06:09:10 -0800, Shel Belinkoff
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > HAR!  If you pay much attention to anything this antonymous poster,
Quasi
> > Modo, says, you'd be deluding yourself. Rob Studdert is probably right. 
> > There's still a very strong demand for manual focus lenses throughout
the
> > world, both from users and collectors.
> > 
> > Shel 
> > 
> > 
> > > [Original Message]
> > > From: Cory Papenfuss 
> > >
> > > On Tue, 29 Mar 2005, Quasi Modo wrote:
> > >
> > > > Manual lenses = too much hassle in this day and age.   We are the
> > > > Instant Gratification Generation.   If I didn't filter my lens
> > > > browsing to auto-focus only I'd be there all day. (I think that
> > > > captures the sentiments of ~90% of ppl in the market for Pentax
> > > > lenses)
> > > >
> > > >
> > >   Great news then... so the 10% of us that like to tinker with 
> > > quality old gear won't have to pay as much for it.  A DSLR with
manual 
> > > lenses is still instant gratification, there are just a few more
steps to
> > 
> > > do along the way.
> > 
> > 
> >


Reply via email to