"Jostein" > Excuse me, P�l, but you statement will not be more correct by > repetition. It's still plain wrong. Your persistence in defending the > 645 system is admireable, but please stick to the truth.
Well, I took it for granted that most are aware that for long telephotos MF looses out just like full frame 35mm looses out compared for APS sized sensors. For lenses in the normal shooting range, that is apart from specialized optics, it does hold truth. Pentax 645 lenses are no larger than Canon high-end glass. In fact, usually smaller. And for the most part no more expensive; often less. Indeed, Herbert Keppler once compared the Pentax 67 system to high-end Nikon and concluded that Pentax MF was cheaper. Of course this doesn't hold if you compare 800mm lenses but that is really beside the point for 99% of us. P�l
