On Tue, 22 Mar 2005, P�l Jensen wrote: > I don't understand your argument at all.
Can I interject? Jostein mailed a comparison of 200mm (35mm equiv) lenses where the Canon was significantly cheaper than P645. You suggested that to be true for the long end, but not for "normal" AOV. Can you provide an example or two where the same angle of view and "similar" quality lenses are quoted and P645 is cheaper than Canon L or Nikon high-end. Kostas
