And where does JPEG 2000 fit in. It's supposed to be lossless, but the few tries I've attempted at using it didn't seem to save much, if any, space.
Shel > [Original Message] > From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > Lossless compression is a good thing, allows you to fit more exposures in > less storage. > ======== > As long as, John Francis pointed out, it is truly lossless. > > Marnie Hmmm.
