Tell that to Kodak, with their 13mp sensor using a Nikon lens mount, which is about the same size as a K mount. The camera gets very good reviews within it's limitations. Mostly due to a small buffer for the amount of data produced by the huge sensor. It probably sells well enough as well, after all it sells for about $4000 or a bit less while the Canon 11mp FF digital SLR sells for about twice that.

I'm pretty good with wave physics and I don't see you point. Pentax Nikon and Olympus are going with smaller sensor because that's what's available for affordable cameras.

John Celio wrote:

I told him I was waiting for Pentax to come out with a full frame. At this, the NotNikonIt guy next to him almost fell to the floor laughing. "Pentax will have a full frame DSLR when pigs fly!", he said. I said, "I think they're trying to train them now."


Dude, he's telling the truth. And anyway, a 35mm-sized sensor on a dSLR requires a much larger lens mount to work as well as on film of the same size; it's just a matter of physics. This is why Pentax, Nikon, Olympus, and KonicaMinolta are going with smaller sensors. If you look at all the facts, it just makes sense.

If you must wait for something, I'd suggest only waiting for high-ISO noise to come down, because you're going to be waiting a *very* long time for a 35mm-sized sensor in a Pentax body. The current APS-C system is not as horrible as you think, and it's only getting better.

John Celio

--
http://www.neovenator.com
http://www.newpixel.net

AIM: Neopifex

"Hey, I'm an artist. I can do whatever I want and pretend I'm making a statement."




--
I can understand why mankind hasn't given up war. During a war you get to drive tanks through the sides of buildings and shoot foreigners - two things that are usually frowned on during peacetime.
--P.J. O'Rourke





Reply via email to