Paul
On Feb 22, 2005, at 3:44 AM, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
--- Shel Belinkoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:I didn't mean for a DSLR specifically. IAC, the idea of usingazoom is something I've not come to grips with - I generallydon'tVariablelike them and, with one exception, sold every one I had - and the small aperture is also something I've never used, with the exception of a couple of wides in the 3.5 - 4.0 range.focus?aperture is a frightening thing as it doesn't allow me to meter properly. Plus I did say manual focus. Isn't the DA autoI may just go ahead and grab a 20/2.8 at some point and see howIlike it. Thanks for your thoughts, though.
a) I don't like zoom lenses either, in general. But when they're the best tool for the job, well, I go with the best tool for the job. The 16-45 is simply an excellent lens, better than most of the wide primes at the extreme end.
b) just because a lens has autofocus capability doesn't mean you cannot focus it manually. I focus the FA31/1.8 manually quite often, same for the F50/1.7. I haven't had the DA16-45 very long as yet, but it focuses manually very nicely.
c) If you want to cover a 24x36 film format, DA lenses are not the right solution.
Godfrey
__________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail - You care about security. So do we. http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail

