> .. So on a smaller surface areas more magnification need to be
> applied in order to achieve the same print size. As such any
> inherent aberrations are magnified. ...
If you were comparing two negatives from different formats, I
would agree with you without question: the smaller format will
show more degradation. But comparing a film negative in
enlargement to a digital image printed to different densities
... No, it doesn't quite translate into the same thing. Digital
printing to a size is purely a matter of pixel density to paper,
not magnification.
Godfrey
--- Rob Studdert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The edges should look sharper than the same lens rendering to
> a full 35mm frame
> but the lenses absolute resolution says the same. So on a
> smaller surface areas
> more magnification need to be applied in order to achieve the
> same print size.
> As such any inherent aberrations are magnified. A quick test
> using a high
> contrast target and a good TC like the AF1.7 will quickly
> reveal whether the
> lens has more or less resolving power than the current 6MP
> bodies.
>
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail - Helps protect you from nasty viruses.
http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail
