> I believe the A model refconcerter has a cutout below the finder > frame to be able to see the data display of the A cameras. Mine is > an M model as well and I can not quite see the display of the Super > A with this. It works well however with every other camera.
Yes, sorry, I neglected to say that but it's basically an enlarged 'hole' in the plate at the bottom, everything else appears to be identical as shown on Boz's site: http://www.bdimitrov.de/kmp/focusing/refconverter-AM.jpg John ---------- Original Message ----------- From: "keller.schaefer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [email protected] Sent: Fri, 11 Feb 2005 14:55:53 +0100 Subject: Re: Refconverter A and a MX > I believe the A model refconcerter has a cutout below the finder > frame to be able to see the data display of the A cameras. Mine is > an M model as well and I can not quite see the display of the Super > A with this. It works well however with every other camera. > > Sven > > Zitat von John Whittingham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > > Perhaps the MX and RefA might have a compatability problem? > > > > The refconverter A should work well with everything from the M series through > > to the *ist. Mine fits everything I have beyond K series, I use refconverter > > II with the KX due to the different viewfinder window on the K. AFAIK The > > refconverter A is apparently the refconverter M with the letter A subsituted > > for the letter M on the bottom. > > > > John > > > > > > ---------- Original Message ----------- > > From: "Hal & Sandra Davis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > To: <[email protected]> > > Sent: Fri, 11 Feb 2005 06:16:48 -0600 > > Subject: Re: Refconverter A and a MX > > > > > Perhaps the MX and RefA might have a compatability problem? RefM > > > would be of the same manufacturing period as MX. Have only the RefM > > > so can't be sure but your posting would suggest just that. > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > From: "Pawel Bartuzi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > To: <[email protected]> > > > Sent: Thursday, February 10, 2005 7:08 PM > > > Subject: Refconverter A and a MX > > > > > > > I would like to ask refconverter A owners here on the list: does your > > > > refconverter stay at 90 angle in relation to a camera back or does it go > > > > down a little? Mine looks as if it looked into viewfinder a little from > > > > under the center of a viewfinder (like in > > > > www.pentax.ca/support/manual_pdfs/accessories/REFConverter.pdf > > > > <http://www.pentax.ca/support/manual_pdfs/accessories/REFConverter.pdf> > > > > - I _think_ I can see that the bottom of the refconverter is not at 90 > > > > angle with the MX back). Also, when looking with x2 magnification I see > > > > that the center of a frame (the split image) is not centered in the > > > > refconverter but rather in a lower part of the refconverters field of > > > > view. Is it normal? > > > > > > > > Pawel > > > > > > > > > > ------- End of Original Message ------- > > > > ------- End of Original Message -------
