That's outrageous!
I wouldn't have paid more than 129.99! ;-)
Actually I bid very high to be sure to get it,
it's the one (semi-affordable) lens I've been
drooling over.
I really want an autofocus 80-200/2.8 someday but
I need to start saving for a trip to GFM to meet
all of you wild and wacky folks this summer.
IF I can get the time off, IF my damn health lets
me, and a zillion other IF's.

Don


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Shel Belinkoff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Sunday, December 12, 2004 7:27 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: Finally, I scored a K35/2 !!!
>
>
> I wouldn't have taken a penny less than 130.00 .... feel better?  Sorry we
> missed connections on that, I'd have loved to have sold it to you.
> Regardless, you're gonna like the lens.
>
> Shel
>
>
> > [Original Message]
> > From: Don Sanderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> > I'm pretty sure I did Shel, I've been looking for a while.
> > Oh well, just tell me you wanted over $128.99 and make me
> > feel good. ;-)
> >
> > Don
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Shel Belinkoff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > Sent: Sunday, December 12, 2004 6:21 PM
> > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > Subject: RE: Finally, I scored a K35/2 !!!
> > >
> > >
> > > Gee, did you post here that you were looking for one?  I've a
> couple and
> > > have been wanting to sell one for quite some time, but never
> got around
> to
> > > it.  In any case, you're gonna like the lens.  "tis a bit
> big, but it's
> > > quite nice ... ;-))
> > >
> > > Shel
> > >
> > >
> > > > [Original Message]
> > > > From: Don Sanderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > > To: PDML <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > > Date: 12/12/2004 4:13:21 PM
> > > > Subject: Finally, I scored a K35/2 !!!
> > > >
> > > > It's taken nearly a year but I finally got  the
> > > > one lens that's eluded me.
> > > > A gen-yoo-wine SMCP 35/2!
> > > > If it's 1/2 as good as everyone says it is
> > > > my D now has a 'normal" lens.
> > > > I like the K 35/3.5 a lot but it's a bit slow.
> > > > 52 equiv. at f:2, yeah!
> > > >
> > > > Don
> > >
> > >
>
>

Reply via email to