When 99% of all the pictures in the world were taken with either a 35mm camera or a 6X6, and never the twain met (most of the time), the focal length was a good substitute for what was actually needed, which was a measurement of the angle of view.
With the advent of digital cameras, with their multiplicity of sensor sizes, we have to grapple with the problem of working out what angle of view will be given by a particular lens on a particular camera.
Why don't we just cut the crap, consign focal length to the dustbin of history, and just talk about AOV? At least it will avoid any more pointless threads about focal lengths being the same whatever camera the lens is used on. Whilst this may be true, it misses the point totally.
John
On Fri, 13 Aug 2004 11:54:44 -0600, William Robb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
----- Original Message ----- From: "Nenad Djurdjevic" Subject: Re: DA14mm - why so large and heavy?
is not
Well put. The focal length of a wide angle lens for medium formatgoing to be a wide focal length for 35mm and a wide 35mm lens isnot widefor an APS sized sensor. The corollary is also true. No one isdisputingthat focal length may well be the same in each case but it is whatthatparticular focal length can do in any particular format thatmatters. Weall like to frame our shots to our satisfaction at the time oftaking thephoto and for that we choose the appropriate focal length lens. Iffor anAPS sensor a 200mm gives me the framing I want (and that happens tobeequivalent to a 300mm lens for 35mm) then I don't give a rats if on someone's 4x5 that 200mm would be a semi-wideangle lens.
All very well and good, until you want to communicate with someone. Then your thought process becomes an impediment because of faulty reasoning.
William Robb
-- Using M2, Opera's revolutionary e-mail client: http://www.opera.com/m2/

