I like this. The red filter was a definite plus. And the woman on the deck makes it interesting. In retrospect, you might have swung your camera to the right a bit and put the station in the left side of the frame. You would have more beach and quite possibly a nicer composition. Would I have thought of it in the heat of battle? Hell no. But it 's easy to be an after the fact critic. That's what I like about PAW. By the way, if it's photo of the week, shouldn't it be POW? Or are we too sensitive for that <vbg>?
On Feb 24, 2004, at 6:51 PM, Shel Belinkoff wrote:


Frank ...

Red filters are neat for darkening the sky, and the added
effect when there are clouds present can often take an
average or mundane scene and turn it into something
dramatic.  Since the lifeguard station will not be moving
any time soon (will it?), you might consider returning to
try for an even more dramatic shot.

The young lady is lost in the photograph, at least on these
small monitors and even smaller JPEG's.  I hope she presents
herself with a stronger presence in the full sized print.

Do you recall what focal length you were using?  I'd think
that with a wider lens (you've a 19mm, right?), moving in
closer, and a more dramatic sky you'd have a more powerful
image.

And yeah, I know, this is what you got, and maybe I
shouldn't give out with the what-if's, but I really believe
that it may be going back to reshoot with some of this in
mind.  As it is, the dark sky is just a dark sky ... no
impact or drama.

shel

frank theriault wrote:

I've been trying to get a decent shot of this lifeguard station at Toronto's
Kew Beach for some time now (Toronto has miles of beautiful beaches near
downtown, but with the heat of summer, they're always polluted, so we can
only look at the pretty water).


This may be the best of the old station I've gotten yet - ironically, a
month ago, in the dead of winter. I like what the red filter does to the
sky, and the young lady relaxing on the picnic table adds, I think, I touch
of whimsy:


http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=2159925

Please let me know what you think (as always, the print's way better than
the scan - oh well...).




Reply via email to