Tom, As I have played around a bit, the photo lab will convert from raw to jpg/tiff with one set of settings. If you only have loaded one image, it applies to the single image. If you have a group of them, they will all get the settings applied during conversion. So for a group, you would use the photo browser, from the thumbnails select the ones that had the common settings, choose photo lab tool. It would load those images into photo lab, make your changes and save to jpg/tiff.
Does this make sense to you? Other questions? Bruce Friday, December 19, 2003, 9:57:29 AM, you wrote: t> Just out of curiousity...how hard is it to batch correct a group of t> raw files with the Pentax software? t> Bruce, many of my flash photos are slightly underexposed as well, but t> it's very easy to correct when batch converting. With the Canon t> software you click on a folder and it displays all the raw files in t> that folder as thumbnails. You can see which ones need a little t> exposure compensation and you can change it *before* you convert. t> I think this is an important distinction and is one reason I don't use t> BB exclusively. With BB, you need to convert each file that has t> changes, or convert a group that has the same changes. You can't say, t> convert a group of files that have various exposure compensations. t> I guess the question is - can you apply various exposure/wb settings t> to files before conversion? If you change settings for one file do you t> have convert it before you move on to the next file or will it t> remember your settings when you convert the whole folder? t> Am I making sense here? t> tv >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Bruce Dayton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> Sent: Thursday, December 18, 2003 8:59 PM >> To: Paul Stenquist >> Subject: Re[2]: Santa Pics >> >> >> Are you saying that the ones that look alright are the unmanipulated >> ones or the ones that had auto levels done? I didn't >> change stops at >> all. One thought is that the Gossen meter is reading >> reading slightly >> off. >> >> My question still stands: >> Is it better to slightly underexpose on the DSLR? >> >> -- >> Best regards, >> Bruce >> >> >> >> Thursday, December 18, 2003, 4:26:42 PM, you wrote: >> >> PS> Many are very nice, but some appear to be underexposed. >> Did you give >> PS> your flash time to recycle? Did you change stops? >> PS> Paul >> PS> On Dec 18, 2003, at 6:40 PM, Tanya Mayer Photography wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >>
