The more contrtasty ones look best on my screen. I'm not sure which were subjected to auto levels. However all of them would print just fine with a tweak in PS.
Paul
On Dec 18, 2003, at 8:59 PM, Bruce Dayton wrote:


Are you saying that the ones that look alright are the unmanipulated
ones or the ones that had auto levels done?  I didn't change stops at
all.  One thought is that the Gossen meter is reading reading slightly
off.

My question still stands:
Is it better to slightly underexpose on the DSLR?

--
Best regards,
Bruce



Thursday, December 18, 2003, 4:26:42 PM, you wrote:

PS> Many are very nice, but some appear to be underexposed. Did you give
PS> your flash time to recycle? Did you change stops?
PS> Paul
PS> On Dec 18, 2003, at 6:40 PM, Tanya Mayer Photography wrote:








Reply via email to