Ok, Jostein, when I said that the light has to strick at an oblique angle, I
meant that it has to happen that this case will exist on the film plane. I
did not mean that the perpendicular case doesn't work. Did you really think
I was saying that the perpendicular case doesn't work, or are you just being
a twit.

Regards,
Bob...
--------------------------------------------
"Do not suppose that abuses are eliminated by destroying
the object which is abused.  Men can go wrong with wine
and women.  Shall we then prohibit and abolish women?"
-Martin Luther

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Jostein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, August 09, 2003 11:25 AM
Subject: Re: CCD light path angle redux


> If light *has* to strike the sensor at an oblique angle, it would
logically
> follow that the chip has a blind spot at the center. So this cannot be
> right, Bob.
>
> cheers,
> Jostein
>
> -----------------------------
> Pictures at: http://oksne.net
> -----------------------------
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Bob Blakely" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Saturday, August 09, 2003 7:05 PM
> Subject: Re: CCD light path angle redux
>
>
> > From: "Mark Erickson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
> > > It should be fairly clear from the figure at the bottom that light
> > striking
> > > the CCD perpendicular to the array gets focused on the sensor.  What
is
> > not
> > > shown is that light striking at an oblique angle will get focused
> adjacent
> > > to the sensor, not on it.
> >
> > This has to be baloney. Light *has* to strike the sensor at an oblique
> angle
> > or an image will not be formed! Only light along the axis of the lens
will
> > be perpendicular to the array, and of this light, only the ray on axis
> will
> > be perpendicular. Of the rays forming a dot on the array along the lens
> > axis, even light from the edges of the aperture will be somewhat
oblique.
> > Now, the question is:
> >
> > What oblique angle is acceptable to the array?
> >
> > This cannot be determined from the inaccurate cartoon provided.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Bob...
> > --------------------------------------------
> > "Do not suppose that abuses are eliminated by destroying
> > the object which is abused.  Men can go wrong with wine
> > and women.  Shall we then prohibit and abolish women?"
> > -Martin Luther
> >
> >
>
>
>

Reply via email to