If light *has* to strike the sensor at an oblique angle, it would logically
follow that the chip has a blind spot at the center. So this cannot be
right, Bob.

IMO, it's pretty obvious that a microlens has an acceptable angle of view.
Within which, the light will trigger the right response in the sensor.
Beyond which, the light will behave in a way that will cause problems. Such
as chromatic aberration, or that the neighbouring responds to light it
should not respond to.

In lenses with poor retrofocus design; ie. where the light hits the focal
plane at a low angle, there should therefore be more problems than for
lenses with a more proper retrofocus design. Apparently, some of the
existing designs are not sufficient to solve this problem, even though they
are good enough for film.

cheers,
Jostein

-----------------------------
Pictures at: http://oksne.net
-----------------------------
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Bob Blakely" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, August 09, 2003 7:05 PM
Subject: Re: CCD light path angle redux


> From: "Mark Erickson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> > It should be fairly clear from the figure at the bottom that light
> striking
> > the CCD perpendicular to the array gets focused on the sensor.  What is
> not
> > shown is that light striking at an oblique angle will get focused
adjacent
> > to the sensor, not on it.
>
> This has to be baloney. Light *has* to strike the sensor at an oblique
angle
> or an image will not be formed! Only light along the axis of the lens will
> be perpendicular to the array, and of this light, only the ray on axis
will
> be perpendicular. Of the rays forming a dot on the array along the lens
> axis, even light from the edges of the aperture will be somewhat oblique.
> Now, the question is:
>
> What oblique angle is acceptable to the array?
>
> This cannot be determined from the inaccurate cartoon provided.
>
> Regards,
> Bob...
> --------------------------------------------
> "Do not suppose that abuses are eliminated by destroying
> the object which is abused.  Men can go wrong with wine
> and women.  Shall we then prohibit and abolish women?"
> -Martin Luther
>
>

Reply via email to