On 9 Aug 2003 at 17:50, William Robb wrote: > We've been here before. I have printed both 4x5 and 6x7 optically. Up to > print sizes of 11x14, there is a small difference in visible quality, with > 4x5 having the edge. It isn't a great enough difference to be visible at > normal viewing distances, you really have to get up close to the pictures to see > it. At 16x20 and larger, the 4x5 definitely shows visible improvement at normal > viewing distances. I don't know if the same holds true for scanned negatives.
How do you think Johns LF (300MB+) scans would hold up against my Mamiya 7 (67) shots scanned at 4000dpi (700MB+)? I think we are comparing scanners again. Rob Studdert HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA Tel +61-2-9554-4110 UTC(GMT) +10 Hours [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://members.ozemail.com.au/~distudio/publications/ Pentax user since 1986, PDMLer since 1998
