Gregory wrote: The only reason I can think of is bulk, but I don't know how bulky it would have to be. But if someone came up with an image stabilizing teleconverter for less than $200, I'd be liable to buy it. I think I'd like that more than a specific lens.
REPLY: Pentax have patented an IS teleconverter. I don't know how viable such a product is technically. I'm thinking of the correction of aberation an IS module must perform. It will cost more than $200 if released; significantly more. P�l
