It's survived two falls in the space of six months without skipping a beat - that's build quality. It does everything it should every time - that's build quality. It's completely consistent from frame to frame - that's build quality. It doesn't have anything loose after two years of nearly every day use - that's build quality. It doesn't rattle, creak, whirr or whine except when it should - that's build quality. It's light and (see first item) obviously strong - that's build quality.
Any one care to add more? John Coyle Brisbane, Australia ----- Original Message ----- From: "Lon Williamson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, June 23, 2003 2:30 AM Subject: Re: Vs: Vs: Lens Mount Progress > I am one of those who feel that build quality is worth paying > for, and may therefore purchase the MZ-S sometime in the next > year or so. It is a bit over-spec'd for my typical shot, so > I can't see the absence of whistles and bells to be a problem. > > Let's hear from some MZ-S owners with regard to build quality. > What do you like/dislike in this regard? > > -Lon > >
