[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > If there had been enough people on the list, to create viable sub lists, it would > have split long ago over: MF/35mm, SM/KM, AF/MF. I mean, how many little pubs do you > think this rag tag group can sustain?
I dunno, but let's all repair to the local pub and find out! keith > BR > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > >>It does make me wonder, however, when 1/2 of this list is using the *istD > >>(presuming it materializes, but I think it will), will some insist the list be > >>broken in two -- one for film and one for sensors?
