frank theriault wrote: > Well, definitions evolve, especially with changes of technology.
They don't have to. It's about usurping through confusion in name. I see no problem with calling an inkjet print an inkjet print. What objective argument exists for having to call it otherwise. cheers, caveman If you are consistent with that logic then a slide or transparency is not a photograph unless printed on silver halide photographic paper. My *personal* definition of a photograph is any image made with a media based camera in a form that allows it to be seen visually. Whether I print it at home on my ink jet or take it to the local lab for printing, the only difference is my choice of media. BUTCH Each man had only one genuine vocation - to find the way to himself. Hermann Hess (Demian)
