Perhaps... and then we'd complain about their quality if they were cheap, and about their price if they were good. :)
chris On Thu, 27 Feb 2003, Brendan wrote: > You never know, Pentax may just flood the market with > cheap 14mm lenses :D > > --- Chris Brogden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Thu, 27 Feb 2003, Mike Johnston wrote: > > > > > In short, there's absolutely nothing wrong with > > the *ist D's 23.5mm x > > > 15.7mm sensor size. There is every reason to > > expect the image quality > > > is going to be excellent, clearly better than > > digicam image quality. > > > > The issue isn't quality, it's lenses. All of a > > sudden that nice 24mm lens > > is a 36mm lens, and if you want a lens that gives > > you the field of view > > that a 24mm lens on a film body does, you're going > > to need to get a 16mm > > rectilinear lens, which don't come cheap. > > > > chris > > > > ______________________________________________________________________ > Post your free ad now! http://personals.yahoo.ca > >
