Ryan, I'm genuinely curious. There are not too many people out there with a 1DS along with a 67. What do you do with this equipment? There is some serious money involved here. I would really be interested to hear what you do and what type of equipment you use.
I'm personally one of those who can see great value in the digital work flow - especially pre-print production (instant feedback, ability to not worry on overshooting with the cost of film - fast proof turnaround, etc), but I really love my P67II at the same time. Would you be willing to share your experiences a bit? Thanks, Bruce Monday, January 27, 2003, 2:53:52 PM, you wrote: RKB> William Robb wrote: >> ----- Original Message ----- >> From: "Ryan K. Brooks" >> Subject: Re: Vs: Vs: Vs: Comparing digital to film >> >> >> >> >>>The 14/32mb argument is a different one, IMHO. And in my experience >>>with the 1Ds, there's no way it's pulling in less information than >>>scanned 35mm film. This argument is the subjective one. >> >> >> Finally, an honest response on the subject. >> What you are saying is that film is limited by the process used to generate >> an electronic facsimile, not by any inherent failure in the media itself. >> Since this is what P�l, Rob, myself and a few others have been saying for >> some time now, it's nice to know that you have come out of your fog on the >> subject. >> RKB> No fog- I just said that my work with the 1Ds is technically better than RKB> my work with film- that's it. RKB> It's nice to know you have an opinion on this without personally working RKB> with the equipment. RKB> I think you're lumping me in with your digital stereotype. RKB> R >> William Robb >> >>
